- Active Series
- Books
- Online
- Journals
- eBooks
Victorian Poetry: Tennyson at Two Hundred
Victorian Poetry Volume 47, Number 1 Spring 2009
Purchase this special commemorative edition as a single issue here!
1 Guest Editor’s Foreword
HERBERT F. TUCKER
7 Unnumbered Polypi
RICHARD MAXWELL
25 Tennyson and the Ladies
LINDA H. PETERSON
45 Getting It Wrong in “: The Lady of Shalott”
ERIK GRAY
61 Tennyson and the Embodied Mind
GREGORY TATE
81 Tennyson and Zeno: Three Infinities
W. DAVID SHAW
101 Eight Reflections of Tennyson’s Ulysses
JAMES NOHRNBERG
151 The Breathing Space of Ballad: Tennyson’s Stillborn Poetics
D. B. RUDERMAN
173 Subtraction and Division: Calculating Loss in In Memoriam
IRENE HSIAO
197 What the Laureate Did Next
Maud TIMOTHY PELTASON
221 “Who knows if he be dead?”: Maud, Signification, and the Madhouse Cantos
ANNE C. MCCARTHY
241 An Adventure in Modern Marriage: Domestic Development in Tennyson’s Geraint and Enid and The Marriage of Geraint
INGRID RANUM
259 The Contemporaneity of The Last Tournament
ROBERT L. PATTEN
285 Tennyson’s Catholic Years: A Point of Contact
DENNIS TAYLOR
313 Delirious Bulldogs and Nasty Crockery: Tennyson as Nonsense Poet
ANNA BARTON
331 Epistolary Tennyson: The Art of Suspension
WILLIAM H. PRITCHARD
349 Contributors
Submission Guidelines
Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth. A Primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators and other child care professionals in improving their teaching/training effectiveness. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
Materials appropriate for publication include experimental research, data based case studies, research reviews, procedure or program descriptions, issue-oriented papers, and brief communications and inquiries. Non-experimental papers should emphasize the manner, in which the described procedure, program, or issues relates to the,practical concerns of professionals in the field. Experimental studies,should demonstrate usefulness of the described procedure, adequacy, of the data in showing a functional relationship between the procedures and observed behavior changes, and evidence that measures taken were reliable. ETC utilizes a broad base of researchers, educators, practitioners, and graduate students in the editorial review process.
Experimental Studies
Manuscripts that document a clear functional relationship between procedures used and behavior changes observed will be considered for publication in the Studies section of ETC. Replications are welcome, especially when the original study has been published in a source that is unlikely to come to the attention of the practitioners who would use the procedures in their work or when the replication includes some change in the procedures, population, or setting for the study. Original research studies that investigate procedures of use to practitioners are also welcome. Potential usefulness of the procedures, behavior changes of magnitudes that have practical implications, accuracy of the data, and clarity of the presentation for practitioners are the criteria used by our reviewers when judging an experimental study manuscript’s suitability for publication in ETC. Data-Based Case Studies Manuscripts that meet the following will be considered for publication in the data based case Studies section of ETC. The minimum requirements are: (1) a demonstration of direct, quantitative measurement of specific client behaviors repeated over time that guided the clinical and/or educational decision making reported in the study; and (2) a contribution to advancing teaching/training/treatment effectiveness by serving as (a) a sources of ideas and hypotheses for further research, (b) a source of developing teaching/training techniques, such as a study of rare phenomenon, (c) a counterinstance for notions that are considered to be universally applicable, or (d) persuasive and motivational (see ETC, 22(2), for references). Replications in real-life situations of procedures developed under rigorous research protocols are welcome, especially when the original study was a highly controlled experiment. Also, data based case studies that highlight efficient and effective means to collect data that guide treatment/teaching will be accepted.
Reviews of the Literature
Reviews should be focused on the implications of the results of studies for practitioners whose clients may benefit from the procedures described by the literature. Reviews need not be comprehensive as long as the literature not included would in no way alter the implications for practice described by the review. The style, format, and organization should be such that practitioners will clearly understand what is being presented. It is important to caution practitioners about the limitations of the implications for practice drawn from the research literature. This may include discussions of legal, ethical, scientific, and logistical limitations and associated issues.
Program Descriptions
It is important for practitioners and program managers to know what resources will be required to successfully implement programs or procedures that have been useful to others. ETC publishes such program or procedure descriptions when reviewers indicate that the description clearly communicates this information. This typically means that the manuscript includes an introduction that identifies a framework into which the program fits, or a rationale for the program’s operation; basic information regarding the geographic area served and the program location, accessibility, funding sources, etc; a clear description of the clients served; the number, types, and training of staff who implemented the program; details of the actual operation of the program; documentation of program successes; and discusses any and all aspects of the program that will allow the readers to determine the feasibility and desirability of implementing the program or procedures in their settings.
Forum Articles
Papers for the Forum section of ETC will generally be discussions of legal, ethical, and other issue important to persons working with children; discussions and/or descriptions of methods and techniques that provide information directly applicable to the assessment, treatment, and evaluation of services for children; descriptions of guidelines or criteria useful in planning and implementing assessment, treatment, and evaluation programs for children; behavior analyses of situations relevant to the education and treatment of children; theoretical papers that focus on the potential applications of the position taken; or requests for information or materials related to the education and treatment of children. It is difficult to describe a set of specific review criteria that are appropriate for the wide variety of manuscripts that can be considered for the Forum section of ETC. In general, Forum manuscripts will be reviewed to determine if the manuscript provides information that can be directly applied to the education and treatment of children; addresses an issue or problem that affects a large population of children, professionals, or parents; clearly and cogently makes its points; considers all of the critical information relevant to the topic; and adds to our knowledge regarding the education and treatment of children.
Book Reviews
The goal of a book review is to provide sufficient information for the reader to make an informed decision regarding their interest in obtaining and reading the book. To accomplish that goal, the reviewer must provide identifying information, a description of the book’s purpose and content, and evaluative comments regarding the adequacy and completeness of the material covered. In general, a relatively complete review will require two to five double-spaced, typed pages.
General Issues in the Reviewing Process
The publication of data-based studies in ETC is intended to provide those involved in the education and treatment of children with useful empirical information. The editorial review process is designed to identify such information in the manuscripts that are submitted for review. The accuracy and clarity of the useful information is shaped by the review process with the result that the investigator’s efforts are recognized by the publication of an article that is of interest to some or all of our readers. The editorial review process articulates what is useful, accurate, and clearly communicated in each manuscript. It also identifies what is not useful, accurate and/or clearly communicated.
Finally, the review process determines whether or not a given manuscript is ready to be published, can be revised so that it will be publishable, or cannot be revised so that it is publishable.
The usefulness of information contained in a manuscript is a judgment made by reviewers who have dealt with similar problem in similar settings. They are asked to determine whether or not the procedures used would be feasible for others to use and whether or not the results produced justify the effort required. Researchers who are familiar with available methodology judge the accuracy of the information presented. They are asked to determine whether or not measurement procedures were used that will give readers confidence that the data reflect the behaviors that occurred. In addition, they indicate whether or not the conditions under which the data were collected in combination with the results obtained are sufficient to assure readers that the procedures employed were responsible for the changes in behaviors that were observed. Reviewers are also asked to comment on the clarity of the presentation and to provide suggestions to the authors that will improve the readability of the manuscript. Only infrequently does a manuscript fully satisfy all the criteria when it s submitted. More frequently manuscripts are improved by the interactions among reviewers, an associate editor, and editor, and the authors as they pass through the editorial review process. Of ten the improvement of a manuscript results in it meeting the publication criteria and it is ultimately published. Sometimes manuscripts cannot be or are not improved sot that they meet the criteria and they are not published.
Submit an Article
Materials appropriate for publication include original experimental research, data-based case studies, research reviews, procedure or program descriptions, issue-oriented papers, and brief communications and inquiries. Nonexperimental papers should emphasize the manner in which the described procedure, program, or issue relates to the practical concerns of professionals in the field. Experimental studies should demonstrate usefulness of the described procedure, adequacy of the data in showing a functional relationship between the procedures and observed behavioral changes, and evidence that measures taken were reliable. ETC utilizes a broad base of researchers, educators, practitioners, and graduate students in the editorial review process.
Authors should submit electronic copies of their manuscripts in either Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF format as e-mail attachments to Bernie Fabry, Ph.D. BCBA, Managing Editor, ETC. Manuscripts should include a 100- to 150-word abstract. Figures must be camera-ready. Manuscripts should adhere to the format presented in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th Ed.) and follow the above guidelines.
Manuscripts are submitted to:
Bernie Fabry, Ph.D., Managing Editor, ETC
Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic
UPMC, 4th Floor
Franklin Building, 1011 Bingham Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203-1101.
Electronic submissions are encouraged. E-mail BDFabry@aol.com.
Submission Guidelines
Send manuscripts (Word file or PDF) to:
Editorial Office of Victorian Poetry
WVU Press
West Virginia University
PO Box 6295
Morgantown, WV 26506-6295
Author's name should appear on title page only. Manuscripts should follow The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition. For more information, contact the editor John B. Lamb at John.Lamb@mail.wvu.edu.
Submission Guidelines
West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies
Mission and Submission Guidelines
Since 1939, West Virginia History has been the premier source of scholarship and research on the history of the Mountain State. Now published in a new series by the West Virginia University Press, West Virginia History: A Journal of Regional Studies will have two issues a year—in the spring and fall.
WVH publishes peer-reviewed research articles on the political, social, economic, and cultural history of the state and its regional context. It also publishes peer-reviewed articles that employ public history methodologies, which includes but is not limited to documentation of public history projects, material culture analysis, and analyses of public history methodologies within the context of the state and region. The journal also publishes peer-reviewed articles on West Virginia history education. These articles are about 8,000 to 12,000 words in length.
WVH covers the field of history in West Virginia in a section titled: Updates, Reflections, and Issues. This includes essays, interviews, and commentaries on topics of interest in West Virginia scholarship, preservation, museums, archives, education, and organizations. These essays are about 2,500 to 5,000 words.
WVH publishes reviews of books and media, including exhibits, programs, films, television shows, plays, albums, podcasts, and websites, about West Virginia history. Reviews are 500 to 600 words, but review essays can be longer.
Submitting an Article Manuscript
Submit your manuscript to wvhistory@wvupress.com as an e-mail attachment. Hal Gorby and Lou Martin are the co-editors of WVH. Correspondence regarding editorial matters should go to:
Hal Gorby, Co-Editor
West Virginia University
Department of History
220A Woodburn Hall
Morgantown, WV 26506
Email: wvhistory@wvupress.com
The homepage for West Virginia History is https://wvupressonline.com/journals/wv_history.
Please submit your manuscript as a Word file (Times New Roman, 12-point) e-mail attachment. To facilitate our policy of anonymous manuscript review, please go to "Properties" in the document and strip out any identifying information. Do include the title of the submission on the first page. The author's name and address (both postal and e-mail) should appear in a separate Word document, along with a 250-word abstract.
Within the Word file, all lines should be justified at the left margin only and should double-spaced, including quotations and notes. Articles should not exceed 12,000 words in length, including endnotes. Quotations longer than eight lines should be set off from the text by indenting 0.5” but not by single spacing. WVH follows the Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.).
We can accept a limited number of illustrations in either glossy photographs or 300 dpi TIF files. Supply each illustration with a caption, accompanied by a source line and such acknowledgments as are required. Authors are responsible for obtaining the necessary permissions in writing before providing them to WVH.
Submitting a Review
Please use the following formats as a header for reviews:
Book
To Save the Land and People: A History of Opposition to Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia. By Chad Montrie. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. Pp. xviii, 245.)
Media
Coal Country, film, written and directed by Phylis Geller, Evening Star Productions, 2009.
The Children of Mother Jones, museum exhibit, curated by Shaun Slifer, West Virginia Mine Wars Museum, 2023.
“Chasing the Moon,” television documentary series, written and directed by Robert Stone, American Experience, PBS, 2019.
“Remembering Floods and Recovering from a Disaster,” produced by Bill Lynch, Inside Appalachia, West Virginia Public Broadcasting, 2023.
Reviews should be double-spaced and between 500–600 words in length. Please submit the review as a Word file (Times New Roman, 12-point) e-mail attachment.
Please include in book reviews a brief summary of its scope, purpose, and content, and an explanation of its significance in the literature on the subject. Include also an evaluation of the author’s use of available sources, organization and presentation of material, and achievement of his or her overall purpose. For media reviews, include a brief summary or description, analysis of its execution, and a discussion of its broader significance. Your evaluations may be favorable or unfavorable, but the review should avoid personal references, should express criticism in a respectful and balanced manner, and should avoid irrelevant digressions. Do not list typographical or other minor errors; mention them only if they significantly impair the value of the book. Please supply page numbers (e.g., 22 or 22–23) for all quoted phrases and passages. If you refer to other books or articles in your review, please provide complete bibliographical information, including the exact page citation. We will copyedit your review prior to publication and will silently correct any errors we might find and edit for clarity and accuracy.
Please complete reviews three months from the date you accept the assignment or inform the editor of your need for an extension.
Submission Guidelines
Tolkien Studies seeks works of scholarly quality and depth. Substantial essays and shorter, “Notes and Documents” pieces are both welcome.
Submissions should be double-spaced throughout and use parenthetical citations in the (Author page) form. A Works Cited page should conform to the Chicago Manual of Style, 14th ed. All citations to Tolkien’s works should follow the “Conventions and Abbreviations” of Tolkien Studies.
Electronic submissions should be sent to Yvette Kisor (ykisor@ramapo.edu) as attachments. Microsoft Word is the preferred word-processing program. Mailed, hard copy submissions are no longer accepted.
Tolkien Studies encourages researchers to send us offprints of articles for inclusion in the yearly Bibliography and Year’s Work. These should be sent to:
Tolkien Studies
c/o Prof. Michael Drout
Wheaton College
26 East Main Street
Norton, MA 02766
Tolkien Studies: An Annual Scholarly Review, Volume 2
Editors: Douglas A. Anderson, Michael D.C. Drout, and Verlyn Flieger
E-ISSN: 1547-3155
ISBN: 978-1-933202-03-7
Institutional Price: $120.00
International Institutional Price: $130.00
Individual Price: $60.00
International Individual Price: $70.00
Table of Contents
- Richard C. West: "And She Name Her Own Name": Being True to One's Word in Tolkien's Middle-earth
- Douglas A. Anderson: Richard C. West: A Checklist
- Miryam Libran-Moreno: Parallel Lives: The Sons of Denethor and the Sons of Telamon
- Judy Ann Ford, The White City: "The Lord of the Rings" as an Early Medieval Myth of the Restoration of the Roman Empire
- Elizabeth Massa Hoiem: World Creation as Colonization: British Imperialism in "Aldarion and Erendis"
- Margaret Sinex: "Tricksy Lights": Literary and Folkloric Elements in Tolkien's Passage of teh Dead Marshes Patchen Mortimer, Tolkien and Modernism
- John Wm. Houghton and Neal K. Keesee: Tolkien, King Alfred, and Boethius
- Kristine Larsen: A Definitive Identification of Tolkien's "Borgil": An Astronomical and Literary Approach
- Linda Greenwood: Love: "The Gift of Death"
- Michael J. Brisbois: Tolkien's Imaginary Nature: An Analysis of the Structure of Middle-Earth
- Douglas A. Anderson: Obituary: Humphrey Carpenter (1946-2005)
- Beth Russell: The Birthplace of J.R.R. Tolkien
- Douglas A. Anderson: J.R.R. Tolkien and W. Rhys Roberts’s “Gerald of Wales on the Survival of Welsh
- Sandra Ballif Straubhaar: Gilraen’s “Linnod”: Function, Genre, Prototype Dale Nelson, Little Nell and Frodo the Halfling
- David Bratman: The Year's Work in Tolkien Studies 2001-2002
- Michael D.C. Drout with Melissa Smith-MacDonald: Bibliography (in English) for 2003
- Book Reviews, Compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
- David Bratman: The Year’s Work in Tolkien Studies
- Marcel Bülles, Michael D.C. Drout, and Rebecca Epstein: Bibliography for 2004
- Book Reviews, Compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
- David Bratman: The Year’s Work in Tolkien Studies
- Marcel Bülles, Michael D.C. Drout, and Rebecca Epstein: Bibliography for 2004
- Book Reviews, Compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
- David Bratman: The Year’s Work in Tolkien Studies
- Marcel Bülles, Michael D.C. Drout, and Rebecca Epstein: Bibliography for 2004
- Book Reviews, Compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
- David Bratman: The Year’s Work in Tolkien Studies
- Marcel Bülles, Michael D.C. Drout, and Rebecca Epstein: Bibliography for 2004
- Book Reviews, Compiled by Douglas A. Anderson
- David Bratman: The Year’s Work in Tolkien Studies
- Marcel Bülles, Michael D.C. Drout, and Rebecca Epstein: Bibliography for 2004


